Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Health Services Research

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The effectiveness of an intervention in increasing community health clinician provision of preventive care: a study protocol of a non-randomised, multiple-baseline trial

  • Kathleen M McElwaine1, 2, 4Email author,
  • Megan Freund1, 2, 4,
  • Elizabeth M Campbell1, 2, 4,
  • Jenny Knight1, 2, 4,
  • Carolyn Slattery1, 4,
  • Emma L Doherty1, 4,
  • Patrick McElduff2, 4,
  • Luke Wolfenden1, 2, 4,
  • Jennifer A Bowman3, 4,
  • Paula M Wye1, 3, 4,
  • Karen E Gillham1, 4 and
  • John H Wiggers1, 2, 4
BMC Health Services Research201111:354

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-11-354

Received: 19 December 2011

Accepted: 30 December 2011

Published: 30 December 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Dec 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen McElwaine
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen McElwaine
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Dec 2011 Author responded Author comments - Kathleen McElwaine
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Dec 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 Dec 2011 Editorially accepted
30 Dec 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-354

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District
(2)
Faculty of Health, The University of Newcastle
(3)
Faculty of Science and Information Technology, The University of Newcastle
(4)
Hunter Medical Research Institute, Clinical Research Centre, Level 3 John Hunter Hospital

Advertisement