Skip to main content

Table 2 Importance of strategies for liver cancer control

From: Identifying and prioritizing strategies for comprehensive liver cancer control in Asia

  Qualitative Quantitative
Strategy Frequency
(Rank)
OLS
(SE)
P-Value
(Rank)
Logit
(SE)
P-Value
(Rank)
Access to treatments 70% 0.192 0.010 1.146 0.004
  (5) (0.07) (3) 0.40 (2)
Centers of excellence 25% 0.192 0.001 1.079 0.002
  (10) (0.05) (2) 0.35 (3)
Clinical education 65% 0.108 0.055 0.625 0.019
  (6) (0.05) (8) 0.27 (7)
Measuring social burden 30% -0.025 0.698 -0.185 0.613
  (8) (0.06) (11) 0.37 (10)
Monitoring of at-risk populations 80% 0.275 < .001 1.508 < 0.001
  (2) (0.06) (1) 0.41 (1)
Multidisciplinary management 35% 0.158 0.004 0.919 0.004
  (7) (0.05) (4) 0.32 (4)
National guidelines 80% 0.158 0.025 0.678 0.056
  (2) (0.06) (6) 0.36 (6)
Public awareness 75% 0.158 0.007 0.841 0.018
  (4) (0.05) (5) 0.36 (5)
Research infrastructure 20% 0.058 0.243 0.337 0.178
  (11) (0.05) (9) 0.25 (9)
Risk-assessment and referral 85% -0.008 0.870 -0.135 0.645
  (1) (0.05) (10) 0.29 (11)
Transplantation infrastructure 30% 0.125 0.196 0.352 0.543
  (8) (0.09) (7) 0.58 (8)
  1. Robust standard errors in parentheses.
\