Skip to main content

Table 3 Organizational characteristics of MCH/Urban Health Units

From: Inputs to quality: supervision, management, and community involvement in health facilities in Egypt in 2004

Characteristic

All Regions

(n = 97)*

Urban Egypta

(n = 19)

Lower Egyptb

(n = 40)

Upper Egyptc

(n = 38)

 

# (%)

# (%)

# (%)

# (%)

External Supervision

    

Facility received external supervision

95 (97.9)

19 (100.0)

40 (100.0)

36 (94.7)

within the previous 6 months

95 (97.9)

19 (100.0)

40 (100.0)

36 (94.7)

Checked registers/books

87 (89.7)

19 (100.0)

36 (90.0)

32 (84.2)

Discussed problems

62 (63.9)

14 (73.7)

23 (57.8)

25 (65.8)

Discussed policy issues

80 (82.5)

18 (94.7)

31 (77.5)

31 (81.6)

Discussed technology problems

42 (43.3)

11 (57.9)ac

22 (55.0)bc

9 (23.7)bc

held an official staff meeting

86 (88.7)

19 (100.0)

36 (90.0)

31 (81.6)

Observed individual staff at work

82 (84.5)

17 (89.5)

32 (80.0)

33 (86.8)

Recorded observations

    

Managerial Processes

    

Facility has a management committee that meets every month or more

40 (41.2)

16 (84.2)ab; ac

11 (27.5)ab

13 (34.2)ac

Facility keeps official records from the management committee meetings

20 (20.6)

10 (52.6)ab; ac

5 (12.5)ab

5 (13.2)ac

Facility has a system for monitoring the quality of care that is delivered

23 (27.1)

3 (16.7)

9 (31.0)

11 (28.9)

Facility keeps written documentation of quality assurance activities

20 (20.6)

3 (15.8)

9 (22.5)

8 (21.1)

Facility has an approach for reviewing quality assurance activities

23 (23.7)

3 (15.8)

9 (22.5)

11 (28.9)

Community/patient involvement

    

Facility holds meetings with both facility managers and community members

41 (42.3)

16 (84.2)ab; ac

13 (32.5)ab

12 (31.6)ac

Facility has a procedure to collect and report patient feedback

2 (2.1)

2 (10.5)ab; ac

0 (0.0)ab

0 (0.0)ac

Facility has instituted changes within the previous 3 months, based on patient feedback

3 (3.1)

1 (5.3)

0 (0.0)

2 (5.3)

  1. ab Urban facilities different from Lower Egypt facilities (p < 0.05)
  2. ac Urban facilities different from Upper Egypt facilities (p < 0.05)
  3. bc Lower Egypt facilities different from Upper Egypt facilities (p < 0.05)
  4. * Percent calculated using non-missing as denominator [missing number range (0 - 11)]