Skip to main content

Table 2 Organizational characteristics of Rural Health Units

From: Inputs to quality: supervision, management, and community involvement in health facilities in Egypt in 2004

Characteristic

All Regions

(n = 307)*

Lower Egyptb

(n = 171)

Upper Egyptc

(n = 136)

 

# (%)

# (%)

# (%)

External Supervision

   

Facility received external supervision

304 (99.0)

171 (100.0)

133 (97.8)

within the previous 6 months

295 (96.1)

167 (97.7)

128 (94.1)

Checked registers/books

239 (77.9)

119 (69.6)bc

120 (88.2)bc

Discussed problems

194 (63.2)

94 (55.0)bc

100 (73.5)bc

Discussed policy issues

199 (64.8)

104 (60.8)bc

95 (79.9)bc

Discussed technology problems

121 (39.4)

65 (38.0)

56 (41.2)

held an official staff meeting

212 (69.1)

109 (63.7)bc

103 (75.7)bc

Observed individual staff at work

266 (86.6)

155 (90.6)

111 (81.6)

Recorded observations

   

Managerial processes

   

Facility has a management committee that meets every month or more

79 (26.0)

41 (24.3)

38 (28.1)

Facility keeps official records from the management committee meetings

24 (7.9)

17 (10.1)

7 (5.2)

Facility has a system for monitoring the quality of care that is delivered

45 (14.9)

32 (19.3)bc

13 (9.6)bc

Facility keeps written documentation of quality assurance activities

37 (12.1)

29 (17.0)bc

8 (5.9)bc

Facility has an approach for reviewing quality assurance activities

37 (12.1)

27 (15.8)bc

10 (7.4)bc

Community/patient involvement

   

Facility holds meetings with both facility managers and community members

51 (16.9)

36 (21.6)bc

15 (11.1)bc

Facility has a procedure to collect and report patient feedback

10 (3.3)

8 (4.7)

2 (1.5)

Facility has instituted changes within the previous 3 months, based on patient feedback

12 (3.9)

7 (4.2)

5 (3.7)

  1. bc Lower Egypt facilities different from Upper Egypt facilities (p < 0.05)
  2. * Percent calculated using non-missing as denominator [missing number range (0 - 6)]