This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluating the value of a web-based natural medicine clinical decision tool at an academic medical center
© Boehmer and Karpa; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 11 April 2011
Accepted: 19 October 2011
Published: 19 October 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Apr 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kelly Karpa|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Oct 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Kelly Karpa|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Oct 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Oct 2011||Editorially accepted|
|19 Oct 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-279|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.