Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Paucity of qualitative research in general medical and health services and policy research journals: analysis of publication rates

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
7 Oct 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
24 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan DeShazo
25 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan EAkin
31 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann McKibbon
8 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Pottie
13 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anna Gagliardi
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
26 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan DeShazo
26 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan EAkin
26 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann McKibbon
4 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kevin Pottie
26 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anna Gagliardi
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Aug 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jonathan DeShazo
10 Oct 2011 Author responded Author comments - Anna Gagliardi
Resubmission - Version 4
10 Oct 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
12 Oct 2011 Editorially accepted
12 Oct 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-268

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement