Dependent Variable | Explained variance (R
2) |
|---|
| Â | Null vs. Model 11
| Model 1 vs. Model 22
| Model 1 vs. Model 33
| Model 2 vs. Model 34
|
|---|
Leadership
| 7.16% | 14.02% | 33.89% | 23.11% |
Culture
| 35.81% | 6.85% | 98.05% | 97.90% |
Evaluation
| 1.11% | 16.62% | 77.70% | 73.25% |
Social Capital
| 14.37% | -7.57% | 87.62% | 88.49% |
OS-Staffing
| 20.08% | 1.86% | 16.85% | 15.27% |
OS-Space
| 2.72% | -1.30% | 46.87% | 47.55% |
OS-Time
| 18.07% | 1.19% | 44.22% | 43.55% |
Formal interactions
| 20.52% | 16.73% | 29.98% | 15.91% |
Informal
interactions
| 24.46% | -4.91% | 67.44% | 68.96% |
Structural and
electronic resources
| 91.69% | -7.71% | 41.73% | 45.90% |
-
1 R
2 = 1 - (Ï„1/Ï„0) where Ï„0 and Ï„1 is the estimated unit-level error variance for the null model and model 1. This measure implies the contribution of individual level covariates in terms of relative error variance reduction when individual level covariates were added to null model.
-
2 R
2 = 1 - (Ï„2/Ï„1) where Ï„1 and Ï„2 is the estimated unit-level error variance for models 1 and 2. This measure implies the contribution of specialty in terms of relative error variance reduction when specialty was added to model 1.
-
3 R
2 = 1 - (Ï„3/Ï„1) where Ï„1 and Ï„3 is the estimated unit-level error variance for the model 1 and 3. This measure implies the contribution of specialty and unit level relative covariates in terms of error variance reduction when specialty and unit level covariates were added to model 1.
-
4 R
2 = 1 - (Ï„3/Ï„2) where Ï„2 and Ï„3 is the estimated unit-level error variance for the model 2 and 3. This measure implies the contribution of specialty and unit-level relative covariates in terms of error variance reduction when unit-level covariates were added to model 2.
- Note: negative R
2 reported in-text as '0'
