Constraints and prospects for contraceptive service provision to young people in Uganda: providers' perspectives

Table 3 Providers' self-assessment score of competence to offer contraceptive services

	Health facility type
Contraceptive Services	*Total* *(n = 102)* *Mean (SD)*	*Public* *(n = 37)* *Mean (SD)*	*PNFP* *(n = 11)* *Mean (SD)*	*PFP* *(n = 54)* *Mean (SD)*	*ANOVA* *F-value*	*p- value*
Comprehensive counseling	1.68 (0.9)	2.1 1(0.57)	1.73 (0.47)	1.37(1.0)	8.94	***
IUD Insertion	0.39 (0.86)	0.27 (0.77)	0.64 (1.12)	0.43 (0.86)	0.86	NS
Norplant/Implant	0.47 (0.98)	0.46 (0.96)	0.45 (1.04)	0.46 (0.98)	0.00	NS
Progestin only injection	2.87 (0.56)	3.00 (0.00)	2.45 (1.21)	2.87 (0.52)	4.33	*
Oral Pills	2.85 (0.56)	3.00 (0.00)	2.55 (1.04)	2.81 (0.59)	3.29	NS
Barrier Methods except condoms	0.42 (0.86)	0.78 (1.16)	0.45 (0.93)	0.17 (0.42)	6.23	*
Fertility awareness methods	1.67 (1.15)	1.95 (1.05)	2.27 (1.19)	1.39 (1.14)	4.45	**
Emergency Contraceptives	1.05 (1.32)	1.19 (1.43)	1.00 (1.34)	0.96 (1.26)	0.33	NS
Condoms	2.93 (0.35)	3.00 (0.00)	2.81 (0.60)	2.90 (0.40)	1.41	NS
Management of side effects	1.68 (1.08)	2.03 (0.87)	1.54 (1.04)	1.46 (1.18)	3.20	*

*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001, NS-Not significant, SD = standard deviation, ANOVA- Analysis of variance.
Scores ranged from 0-3, P-value is from ANOVA test. PNFP- Private not for profit, PFP- private for profit

ISSN: 1472-6963