Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Does pre-ordering tests enhance the value of the periodic examination? Study Design - Process implementation with retrospective chart review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
11 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Hunt
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
9 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Chen
10 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - LIsa Vinci
16 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Hunt
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
4 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ellen Chen
5 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - LIsa Vinci
2 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Hunt
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
30 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Hunt
Resubmission - Version 6
30 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
6 Sep 2011 Author responded Author comments - Vicki Hunt
Resubmission - Version 8
6 Sep 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
13 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
13 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-216

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement