Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A cost comparison of electronic and hybrid data collection systems in Ontario during pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccination campaigns

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Apr 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Pereira
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
24 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Suzanne Bradley
1 Jul 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - gary roselle
12 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Pereira
Resubmission - Version 3
12 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Pereira
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Pereira
Resubmission - Version 5
27 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
28 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Pereira
Resubmission - Version 6
28 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
3 Aug 2011 Author responded Author comments - Jennifer Pereira
Resubmission - Version 8
3 Aug 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
1 Sep 2011 Editorially accepted
1 Sep 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-210

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement