Table 2 Multinomial logit regression on TZD adoption
| Â | innovators and early adopters v.s. late majority and laggards | Â | Â | early majority v.s. late majority and laggards | Â | Â |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total | OR2 | 95% CI | Â | OR2 | 95% CI | Â |
Ownership | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Ref: Public Hospital |  |  |  |  |  |  |
   Non-profit Hospital | 4.12 | (1.56 10.87) | ** | 4.77 | (1.87 12.2) | ** |
   Private Hospital | 3.91 | (1.64 9.36) | ** | 3.38 | (1.41 8.09) | * |
BNHI Regions | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
   Ref: Taipei |  |  |  |  |  |  |
   Northern | 0.51 | (0.19 1.39) |  | 0.47 | (0.18 1.23) |  |
   Central | 0.85 | (0.35 2.06) |  | 0.58 | (0.24 1.40) |  |
   Southern | 1.31 | (0.51 3.33) |  | 0.90 | (0.36 2.23) |  |
   Kao-Ping | 0.91 | (0.38 2.20) |  | 0.73 | (0.32 1.68) |  |
   Eastern | 0.30 | (0.03 2.93) |  | 0.96 | (0.22 4.09) |  |
Herfindahl-Hirschman Indexes1 (unit: HHI*100) | 0.95 | (0.92 0.98) | ** | 0.97 | (0.94 0.99) | * |
log (total DDD of DM in February, 2001) | 1.93 | (1.50 2.49) | *** | 1.64 | (1.30 2.08) | *** |