Criteria used to construct the indicators |
---|
1. The indicator measured performance of an intervention or treatment with potential health benefits for the patient |
2. The indicator was supported by scientific evidence or professional consensus |
3. The indicator was under the control or influence of the care provider or health plan |
4. Evidence to evaluate the indicator could be found in the medical record and its absence from the record could be considered a marker for poor quality |
Criteria used to evaluate the indicators |
Criteria for validity |
1. Adequate scientific evidence of professional consensus exists supporting the indicator |
2. Identifiable health benefits to patients who receive care specified by the indicator |
3. Health professionals with significantly higher rates of adherence to an indicator would be considered higher quality providers |
4. Most factors that determine adherence to an indicator are under the control of the health professional (or are subject to influence by the health professional). |
Criteria for feasibility |
1. The information necessary to determine adherence is likely to be found in a typical medical record |
2. Estimates of adherence to the indicator - based on medical record data - are likely to be reliable and unbiased. |
3. Failure to document the indicator is itself a marker for poor quality |