This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Client satisfaction among participants in a randomized trial comparing oral methadone and injectable diacetylmorphine for long-term opioid-dependency
© Marchand et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
Received: 3 November 2010
Accepted: 26 July 2011
Published: 26 July 2011
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Nov 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Dec 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulrich W. Preuss|
|23 May 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Joan Trujols|
|16 Jun 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jun 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Jul 2011||Author responded||Author comments - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jul 2011||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|26 Jul 2011||Editorially accepted|
|26 Jul 2011||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-11-174|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.