Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Client satisfaction among participants in a randomized trial comparing oral methadone and injectable diacetylmorphine for long-term opioid-dependency

  • Kirsten I Marchand1,
  • Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes1, 2Email author,
  • Daphne Guh1,
  • Suzanne Brissette3,
  • David C Marsh2, 4, 5 and
  • Martin T Schechter1, 2
BMC Health Services Research201111:174

Received: 3 November 2010

Accepted: 26 July 2011

Published: 26 July 2011

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
3 Nov 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
8 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ulrich W. Preuss
23 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joan Trujols
16 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jul 2011 Author responded Author comments - Eugenia Oviedo-Joekes
Resubmission - Version 3
25 Jul 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
26 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-174

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, Providence Health Care, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, Canada
School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Canada
Centre for Addiction Research BC, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Sudbury, Canada