Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Tinnitus referral pathways within the National Health Service in England: a survey of their perceived effectiveness among audiology staff

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Dec 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander
Resubmission - Version 3
18 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stella Forti
15 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pauline Smith
25 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - rich tyler
19 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander
Resubmission - Version 4
19 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stella Forti
23 May 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pauline Smith
1 Jun 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - rich tyler
3 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
30 Jun 2011 Author responded Author comments - Phillip Evan Gander
Resubmission - Version 7
30 Jun 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
6 Jul 2011 Editorially accepted
6 Jul 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-162

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement