Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Health service utilization in IBD: comparison of self-report and administrative data

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Jun 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donna McAlpine
4 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Maa
17 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Perle
5 Jan 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Bernstein
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jan 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stephen Perle
22 Jan 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Maa
7 Feb 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donna McAlpine
4 Apr 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Bernstein
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Apr 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Apr 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Maa
24 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Bernstein
Resubmission - Version 4
24 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Bernstein
Resubmission - Version 6
25 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
28 May 2011 Author responded Author comments - Charles Bernstein
Resubmission - Version 8
28 May 2011 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
31 May 2011 Editorially accepted
31 May 2011 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-11-137

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement