Skip to main content

Table 1 EFA 3-factor solution: Promax rotated loadings

From: Validity and reliability of a multiple-group measurement scale for interprofessional collaboration

Item Factor 1 Factor 2 Factor 3
1. <We> have a good understanding with <them> about our respective responsibilities. 0.501 0.104 -0.093
2. <They> are usually willing to take into account the convenience of <us> when planning their work. 0.113 0.820 -0.069
3. *I feel that patient treatment and care are not adequately discussed between <us> and <them>. 0.659 -0.083 0.201
4. <We> and <they> share similar ideas about how to treat patients. 0.614 0.065 -0.110
5. <They> are willing to discuss <our> issues. 0.207 0.524 0.304
6. <They> cooperate with the way we organize <our> care. 0.074 0.665 0.445
7. <They> would be willing to cooperate with new <our> practices. 0.616 0.097 0.298
8. *The <they> do not usually ask for <our> opinions. 0.400 -0.017 0.344
9. <They> anticipate when <we> will need their help. 0.511 0.204 0.053
10. Important information is always passed on between <us> and <them>. 0.649 0.039 -0.097
11. *Disagreements with <them> often remain unresolved. 0.229 -0.120 0.597
12. *<They> think their work is more important than the work of <us>. -0.108 0.186 0.834
13. *<They> would not be willing to discuss their new practices with <us>. 0.106 -0.041 0.660
14. It is important to communicate well with <them>. -0.147 0.054 -0.003
  1. Note: Terms in angle braces (< >) are replaced by professional group labels: physicians, nurses, or allied health staff.
  2. * means the item is phrased negatively and responses were reverse-coded.
  3. Bold: Candidate factor for item placement. Italic: Cross-loading item.