Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Experiences of mental illness stigma, prejudice and discrimination: a review of measures

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Sep 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Elaine Brohan
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wim van Brakel
20 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Tommy Bjorkman
26 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elaine Brohan
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
9 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elaine Brohan
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
16 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elaine Brohan
Resubmission - Version 6
16 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Resubmission - Version 7
Submitted Manuscript version 7
22 Mar 2010 Author responded Author comments - Elaine Brohan
Resubmission - Version 8
22 Mar 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 8
Publishing
25 Mar 2010 Editorially accepted
25 Mar 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-80

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement