Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Checklists in the operating room: Help or hurdle? A qualitative study on health workers' experiences

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Aug 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brigette Hales
9 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Byrnes
13 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Øyvind Thomassen
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brigette Hales
1 Dec 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matthew Byrnes
14 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Øyvind Thomassen
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Øyvind Thomassen
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
20 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
20 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-342

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement