Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Do inter-hospital comparisons of in-hospital, acute myocardial infarction case-fatality rates serve the purpose of fostering quality improvement? An evaluative study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Oct 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Elizabeth DeLong
26 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kuo-Piao Chung
19 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Willem Aelvoet
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kuo-Piao Chung
29 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Willem Aelvoet
Resubmission - Version 3
29 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
6 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Willem Aelvoet
Resubmission - Version 4
6 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
8 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Willem Aelvoet
Resubmission - Version 6
8 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
8 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
8 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-334

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement