Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Sep 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
4 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pia Lopez-Jornet
5 Oct 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marjan Faber
15 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Strech
Resubmission - Version 2
15 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marjan Faber
26 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Strech
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
3 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Strech
Resubmission - Version 4
3 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
6 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Daniel Strech
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
7 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
7 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-332

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement