From: The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study
Recommendation theme | Sub-theme | IAB1 | SG2 | LEAP3 | SCS-G3 | Individual experts | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1. Scientific | Â | 15 | 21 | 12 | 9 | 45 | 102 |
 | Design advice | 11 | 14 | 8 | 7 | 33 | 73 |
 | Suggestion for a study extension | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 8 |
 | Recommendation for intervention content | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
 | Conceptual suggestion | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
 | Advice specific to PhDs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
2. Pragmatic | Â | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
 | Implementation advice | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
 | Recommendation for language to use | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
 | Advice about dissemination | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
3. Resources | Â | 11 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 38 |
 | Published work to consider | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
 | Unpublished work to consider | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
 | Expert person/group to contact | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 17 |
4. Collaboration | Ongoing contact about specific issue | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
5. Committee | Role and composition of committee | 5 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
Total | Â | 37 | 36 | 20 | 9 | 70 | 172 |