Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The contribution of advisory committees and public involvement to large studies: case study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
2 Jul 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
16 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Alison McDonald
15 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Michie
30 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Duclos
30 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
3 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Susan Michie
3 Nov 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philippe Duclos
17 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Dec 2010 Author responded Author comments - Mike Slade
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Dec 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Dec 2010 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-323

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement