Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Avoidable readmission in Hong Kong - system, clinician, patient or social factor?

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 May 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
10 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Halfon
10 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnes De Bruin
11 Jun 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael van den Berg
13 Aug 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ho Kwan Yam
Resubmission - Version 2
13 Aug 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Michael van den Berg
30 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patricia Halfon
6 Sep 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Agnes De Bruin
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ho Kwan Yam
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
11 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ho Kwan Yam
Resubmission - Version 5
11 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
15 Nov 2010 Author responded Author comments - Ho Kwan Yam
Resubmission - Version 7
15 Nov 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
17 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
17 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-311

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement