Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An evaluation of the effect of an educational intervention for Australian social workers on competence in delivering brief cognitive behavioural strategies: A randomised controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
28 Apr 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Manassis
13 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll
18 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Murrihy
28 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
16 Jul 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Armstrong
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Jul 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katharina Manassis
30 Jul 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Carroll
5 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rachael Murrihy
22 Aug 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aloysius Niroshan Siriwardena
20 Sep 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Armstrong
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Sep 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Armstrong
Resubmission - Version 4
26 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
27 Oct 2010 Author responded Author comments - Gregory Armstrong
Resubmission - Version 6
27 Oct 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
5 Nov 2010 Editorially accepted
5 Nov 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-304

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement