Skip to main content

Table 1 List of excluded studies on economic evaluation assessment with reason for exclusion

From: A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: A way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Reference

Reason for exclusion

1. Barnett et al. 2010 [44]

Cost study

2. Basu, Rubello 2008 [45]

Review

3. Biersack 2009 [46]

Review

4. Bunyaviroch, Coleman 2006 [47]

Review

5. Buscombe, O'Rourke 2007 [48]

Review

6. Chua et al. 2008 [49]

Review

7. Chuck et al. 2005 [50]

Cost study

8. Cleemput et al. 2005 [6]

Health technology assessment report

9. Cleemput et al. 2008 [51]

Methodology paper

10. De Geus-Oei et al. 2006 [52]

Review

11. Devaraj et al. 2007 [53]

Review

12. Eloubeidi et al. 2005 [54]

Cost study

13. Facey et al. 2007 [4]

Health technology assessment report

14. Goh 2006 [55]

Comment

15. Gould 2006 [41]

Review

16. Graham 2009 [56]

Comment

17. Hayashi et al. 2005 [28]

Research question

18. Herbertson et al. 2009 [57]

Review

19. Heinrich et al. 2005 [58]

Cost study

20. Herder et al. 2006 [59]

Cost study

21. Hoekstra et al. 2006 [60]

Methodology paper

22. Juweid, Cheson 2006 [61]

Review

23. Krug et al. 2009 [62]

Cost study

24. Krug et al. 2008 [63]

Cost study

25. Krug et al. 2007 [64]

Methodology paper

26. Kwee et al. 2008 [65]

Review

27. Mattar 2007 [66]

Review

28. Meyers et al. 2006 [67]

Research question

29. Moulin-Romsee et al. 2008 [68]

Cost study

30. Nosotti et al. 2008 [69]

Cost study

31. Pertile 2009 [70]

Methodology paper

32. Pertile et al. 2009 [71]

Cost study

33. Plathow et al. 2008 [72]

Cost study

34. Poulou et al. 2009 [73]

Cost study

35. Remonnay et al. 2009 [74]

Cost study

36. Remonnay et al. 2008 [75]

Cost study

37. Rowan 2008 [76]

News

38. Sloka, Hollett 2005 [77]

Review

39. Spiro et al. 2008 [78]

Review

40. Strobel et al. 2007 [79]

Cost study

41. Sun et al. 2008 [80]

Review

42. Takahashi et al. 2007 [81]

Review

43. Uyl-de Groot et al. 2010 [82]

Cost study

44. Van den Bruel et al. 2007 [83]

Methodology paper

45. Van Tinteren et al. 2006 [84]

Comment

46. Van Hooren et al. 2009 [85]

Cost study

47. Von Schulthess et al. 2006 [27]

Review

48. Watson et al. 2006 [86]

Review

49. Yap et al. 2005 [87]

Cost study

50. Yasunaga 2009 [88]

Outcome evaluation study

51. Yasunaga et al. 2006 [89]

Outcome evaluation study

52. Zubeldia et al. 2005 [90]

Cost study