Skip to main content

Table 1 List of excluded studies on economic evaluation assessment with reason for exclusion

From: A systematic review of PET and PET/CT in oncology: A way to personalize cancer treatment in a cost-effective manner?

Reference Reason for exclusion
1. Barnett et al. 2010 [44] Cost study
2. Basu, Rubello 2008 [45] Review
3. Biersack 2009 [46] Review
4. Bunyaviroch, Coleman 2006 [47] Review
5. Buscombe, O'Rourke 2007 [48] Review
6. Chua et al. 2008 [49] Review
7. Chuck et al. 2005 [50] Cost study
8. Cleemput et al. 2005 [6] Health technology assessment report
9. Cleemput et al. 2008 [51] Methodology paper
10. De Geus-Oei et al. 2006 [52] Review
11. Devaraj et al. 2007 [53] Review
12. Eloubeidi et al. 2005 [54] Cost study
13. Facey et al. 2007 [4] Health technology assessment report
14. Goh 2006 [55] Comment
15. Gould 2006 [41] Review
16. Graham 2009 [56] Comment
17. Hayashi et al. 2005 [28] Research question
18. Herbertson et al. 2009 [57] Review
19. Heinrich et al. 2005 [58] Cost study
20. Herder et al. 2006 [59] Cost study
21. Hoekstra et al. 2006 [60] Methodology paper
22. Juweid, Cheson 2006 [61] Review
23. Krug et al. 2009 [62] Cost study
24. Krug et al. 2008 [63] Cost study
25. Krug et al. 2007 [64] Methodology paper
26. Kwee et al. 2008 [65] Review
27. Mattar 2007 [66] Review
28. Meyers et al. 2006 [67] Research question
29. Moulin-Romsee et al. 2008 [68] Cost study
30. Nosotti et al. 2008 [69] Cost study
31. Pertile 2009 [70] Methodology paper
32. Pertile et al. 2009 [71] Cost study
33. Plathow et al. 2008 [72] Cost study
34. Poulou et al. 2009 [73] Cost study
35. Remonnay et al. 2009 [74] Cost study
36. Remonnay et al. 2008 [75] Cost study
37. Rowan 2008 [76] News
38. Sloka, Hollett 2005 [77] Review
39. Spiro et al. 2008 [78] Review
40. Strobel et al. 2007 [79] Cost study
41. Sun et al. 2008 [80] Review
42. Takahashi et al. 2007 [81] Review
43. Uyl-de Groot et al. 2010 [82] Cost study
44. Van den Bruel et al. 2007 [83] Methodology paper
45. Van Tinteren et al. 2006 [84] Comment
46. Van Hooren et al. 2009 [85] Cost study
47. Von Schulthess et al. 2006 [27] Review
48. Watson et al. 2006 [86] Review
49. Yap et al. 2005 [87] Cost study
50. Yasunaga 2009 [88] Outcome evaluation study
51. Yasunaga et al. 2006 [89] Outcome evaluation study
52. Zubeldia et al. 2005 [90] Cost study