This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Comparison of the performance of the CMS Hierarchical Condition Category (CMS-HCC) risk adjuster with the charlson and elixhauser comorbidity measures in predicting mortality
© Li et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010
Received: 11 February 2010
Accepted: 20 August 2010
Published: 20 August 2010
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|11 Feb 2010||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Robst|
|28 Apr 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bodin Khwannimit|
|3 May 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hangsheng Liu|
|16 Jul 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Pengxiang Li|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|16 Jul 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|20 Jul 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - John Robst|
|4 Aug 2010||Author responded||Author comments - Pengxiang Li|
|4 Aug 2010||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hangsheng Liu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Aug 2010||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|20 Aug 2010||Editorially accepted|
|20 Aug 2010||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-10-245|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.