Skip to main content

Table 1 Standard elements covered on REB applications

From: Ethics review as a component of institutional approval for a multicentre continuous quality improvement project: the investigator's perspective

Element

No. (%) of the 16 sites

Basic Study Information

 

Purpose/objectives

9 (56%)

Signature of department head or supervisor

7 (44%)

Checklist of documents

7 (44%)

Study Methods

 

Multicentre

10 (63%)

Study Design

9 (56%)

Location of research

12 (75%)

Description of procedures

9 (56%)

How outcomes measured

4 (25%)

Subjects

 

Normal subjects enrolled?

4 (25%)

Inclusion/exclusion criteria

12/11 (75, 69%)

Risks

10 (63%)

Benefits

10 (63%)

Time required of subject

4 (25%)

Participant contacted by telephone or letter during study?

4 (25%)

Privacy/Confidentiality

 

General description of privacy/confidentiality measures

6 (38%)

Conflict of interest

6 (38%)

Research staff credentials

6 (38%)

Independent peer review?

5 (31%)

Budget

 

Fee for Service Payment details with sponsor

6 (38%)

Budget Details Requested

11 (68%)

Resource implications for hospital

4 (25%)