Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The effectiveness of computerized clinical guidelines in the process of care: a systematic review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
11 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierre Durieux
23 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou
27 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Jul 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Pierre Durieux
31 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Glasziou
11 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
19 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani
Resubmission - Version 4
19 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
22 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Gianfranco Damiani
Resubmission - Version 6
22 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
4 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
4 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement