Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Criteria for priority setting of HIV/AIDS interventions in Thailand: a discrete choice experiment

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jul 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
14 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl LL Carling
16 Sep 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Godfrey Woelk
5 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lehana Thabane
8 Feb 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sitaporn Youngkong
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Feb 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lehana Thabane
9 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl LL Carling
25 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sitaporn Youngkong
Resubmission - Version 3
25 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sitaporn Youngkong
Resubmission - Version 4
29 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
7 Jul 2010 Editorially accepted
7 Jul 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-197

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement