Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A pre-post test evaluation of the impact of the PELICAN MDT-TME Development Programme on the working lives of colorectal cancer team members

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
23 Nov 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
17 Apr 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - John Monson
11 May 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dag Hofoss
8 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cath Taylor
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cath Taylor
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 4
18 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cath Taylor
Resubmission - Version 5
18 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
28 Jun 2010 Author responded Author comments - Cath Taylor
Resubmission - Version 7
28 Jun 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
29 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
29 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-187

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement