Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Guidelines; from foe to friend? Comparative interviews with GPs in Norway and Denmark

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Aug 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arash Rashidian
12 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steve Harrison
30 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eileen McKinlay
30 Nov 2009 Author responded Author comments - Benedicte Carlsen
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Nov 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Steve Harrison
21 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arash Rashidian
22 Dec 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eileen McKinlay
5 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Benedicte Carlsen
Resubmission - Version 3
5 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
13 Jan 2010 Author responded Author comments - Benedicte Carlsen
Resubmission - Version 5
13 Jan 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
16 Jan 2010 Editorially accepted
16 Jan 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-17

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement