Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Tracking the evolution of hospice palliative care in Canada: A comparative case study analysis of seven provinces

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jan 2010 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Feb 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Seamark
7 Mar 2010 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Friedemann Nauck
29 Apr 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Dykeman
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Apr 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 May 2010 Author responded Author comments - Sarah Dykeman
Resubmission - Version 6
25 May 2010 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
1 Jun 2010 Editorially accepted
1 Jun 2010 Article published 10.1186/1472-6963-10-147

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement