Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Health Services Research

Fig. 3

From: Implementation of an audit and feedback module targeting low-value clinical practices in a provincial trauma quality assurance program: a cost-effectiveness study

Fig. 3

Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) between A&F module and status quo scenario and cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier (CEAF). The x-axis represents the willingness-to-pay (WTP) for each LVP avoided. The y-axis represents the percentage of simulations in which the A&F module is cost-effectiveness relative to the status quo scenario at different WTP threshold. The switch point where the A&F module became a cost-effective intervention corresponds to $160 per LVP avoided, equal to the ICER estimate. A&F module became 100% cost-effective at a WTP of $1000 per LVP avoided. The A&F module had the highest expected net benefit, for all values of WTP greater than the ICER. At our ICER estimate, 50% of the distribution of ICERs were cost-effective

Back to article page

BMC Health Services Research

ISSN: 1472-6963

Contact us