Feasibility of a quality-improvement program based on routinely collected health outcomes in Dutch primary care physical therapist practice: a mixed-methods study

Table 2 Mean scores of all participants on the IAM, FIM, AIM, and the self-assessment checklists

Mean (SD) Fulfilling the criteria (Yes/No)
IAM*	16.5 (1.9)	Yes^†
FIM*	17.1 (2.2)	Yes^†
AIM*	16.4 (1.5)	Yes^†
Self-assessment checklist during QI (six weeks after start) ^‡	6.1 (1.8)	N.A.
Self-assessment checklist at the end of QI (three months after start) ^‡	7.3 (1.7)	N.A.
Self-assessment checklist post-QI (nine months after start) ^‡	7.3 (1.6)	N.A.
Total average on all self-assessment checklists^‡	6.9 (1.7)	Yes^§

IAM = Intervention Appropriate Measure; FIM = Feasibility Intervention Measure; AIM = Acceptability Intervention Measure; SD = standard deviation; QI = quality improvement. ^* Scores range from 4–20; a higher score indicates a greater appropriateness, feasibility, and/or acceptability. ^†For the QI program to be judged as appropriate, feasible, and acceptable, a minimum mean score of 15 out of 20, averaged over all participants, on each questionnaire (AIM, FIM, or IAM, respectively) was required. ^‡Scores range from 0–10; a higher score indicates more development in clinical performance. ^§For the QI program to be judged as impacting the development of clinical performance, a minimum mean score of 5 out of 10, averaged over all competed self-assessment checklists, was required

ISSN: 1472-6963