Skip to main content

Table 1 Key characteristics of identified pay-for.performance programs in ophthalmology

From: Characterization and effectiveness of pay-for-performance in ophthalmology: a systematic review

 

Year of Implementation

Countries

Quality measurements

Object of financial incentives

Empirical studies

Study Scorea

MedEncentive

2004

USA (City of Duncan)

Reporting Quality

Compliance with guideline-based treatment recommendations

Compliance with physicians instructions

Patient satisfaction

Physician

Patient

1 study:

introduction of P4P led to less global expenditures

45.8%

Kaiser Permanente

Northern California

1999

USA (California)

Screening rate for diabetic retinopathy

Medical facility

1 study: Removal of financial led to a decrease in screening rate for diabetic retinopathy

71.4%

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

2006

USA

Reporting quality

Physician

n.a.

n.a.

ProvenCare

2006

USA

Compliance with best practise guidelines for cataract surgery

n.a.

n.a.

n.a.

  1. aMethodological quality of a study (study score) was measured according to Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists [32]