Skip to main content

Table 3 Factors associatedawith utilization of ‘Chiranjeevi Yojana (CY)’b in subsequent child birth among multiparous eligible womenc in Gujaratd, India (Jan-July 2013) (N = 997)e

From: Effect of previous utilization and out-of-pocket expenditure on subsequent utilization of a state led public-private partnership scheme “Chiranjeevi Yojana” to promote facility births in Gujarat, India

Variable

Type

Total

(N)

CY utilization

n (%)

Crude RR (95% CI)

Adjusted RR (95% CI)

Socio-Demographic Variables

Age

 

≤25years

>25 years

461

536

142 (31)

176 (33)

Ref

1.1 (0.9,1.3)

Ref

1.05 (0.9,1.2)

Education

 

No Education

Primary Education

Secondary Education

> High School Education

494

99

301

103

127 (26)

23 (23)

119 (40)

49 (48)

Ref

0.9 (0.6,1.3)

1.5 (1.3,1.9)

1.9 (1.4,2.4)

Ref

0.95 (0.7,1.4)

1.2 (1.1,1.5)

1.3 (1.2,1.6)

Eligibility criteria

BPL or ST

BPL and ST

726

271

171 (24)

147 (54)

Ref

2.3 (1.9, 2.8)

Ref

1.7 (1.4, 2.1)

Joint family

 

No

Yes

317

680

92 (29)

226 (33)

Ref

1.2 (0.9,1.4)

Ref

1.04 (0.8,1.3)

Pregnancy related Variables

Previous CY Utilization

 

No

Yes

708

289

136 (19)

182 (63)

Ref

3.3 (2.8,3.9)

Ref

2.7 (2.2,3.3)

Expenditure during Previous Child Birth

 

Expense- No

Expense- Yes

370

627

169 (45)

149 (23)

1.9 (1.6, 2.3)

Ref

1.04 (0.9,1.3)

Ref

Previous Birth Outcome

 

Dead

Alive

58

939

13 (22)

305 (32)

Ref

1.5 (0.9, 2.4)

Ref

1.1 (0.7,1.8)

Subsequent Birth Type

 

Operative

Vaginal

31

966

2 (6.5)

316 (33)

Ref

5.07 (1.3,19.4)

Ref

3.6 (1.01,12.4)

  1. aregression (poisson), enter method as CY utilization in current child birth as outcome; ba state led public private partnership scheme to increase institutional birth among socially disadvantaged population; cwomen belonging to socially disadvantaged population; dDahod, Sabarkantha, Surendranagar; evariables with bivariate p < 0.2 shown in table, fStandard of living, Category (BPL/ST/Both) and ANC complications had high collinearity with birth type and were therefore not included in the model
  2. (Odds mentioned as bold are significant values in the model)