Using implementation facilitation to foster clinical practice quality and adherence to evidence in challenged settings: a qualitative study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 12 October 2015
Accepted: 1 April 2017
Published: 20 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|12 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Williams|
|18 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marc Atkins|
|26 Jul 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Mona J Ritchie|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Jul 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Mark Williams|
|29 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Mona J Ritchie|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12913-017-2217-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.