Skip to main content

Table 5 Factors affecting Annual HbA1c test in a year, 2013

From: Case management of patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional survey in Chongqing, China

Variables

Type

Non-annual HbA1c test

N(%)

Annual HbA1c test

N(%)

Unadjusted OR/95%CI

P

Adjusted OR/95%CIe

P

Type of residence

Urban

268 (89.63)

31 (10.37)

1.00

Rural

188 (95.43)

9 (4.57)

2.42

(1.12 ~ 5.19)

0.02

NA

NA

Education a

Middle school or higher

154 (87.01)

23 (12.99)

1.00

Primary school

175 (95.11)

9 (4.89)

2.90

(1.30 ~ 6.47)

0.01

NA

NA

Illiterate

122 (93.85)

8 (6.15)

2.28

(0.98 ~ 5.27)

>0.05

NA

NA

Income category b

High

140 (85.89)

23 (14.11)

1.00

Middle

171 (95.53)

8 (4.47)

3.51

(1.52 ~ 8.09)

<0.01

NA

NA

Low

140 (94.59)

8 (5.41)

2.88

(1.24 ~ 6.65)

0.01

NA

NA

Type of health insurance c

UEBMI

103 (81.10)

24 (18.90)

1.00

URRBMI

352 (95.65)

16 (4.35)

5.13

(2.62 ~ 10.01)

<0.01

5.40

(2.73 ~ 10.69)

<0.01

Involved in the targeted disease reimbursement program d

Yes

135 (88.24)

18 (11.76)

1.00

No

318 (93.53)

22 (6.47)

1.93

(1.00 ~ 3.71)

<0.05

NA

NA

  1. a Data was missing for five patients
  2. b Data was missing for six patients
  3. c Data was missing for one patients
  4. d Data was missing for three patients
  5. e Adjusted for study sites, age, sex, education, type of residence, level of income, type of health insurance, status of enrollment in the targeted disease reimbursement program and years of living with Type 2 DM. Data without statistically significant were not shown