Skip to main content

Table 4 Background Characteristics of children by status of Minimum Acceptable Diet

From: How is perceived community cohesion and membership in community groups associated with children’s dietary adequacy in disadvantaged communities? A case of the Indian Sundarbans

 

Minimum acceptable diet

Chi 2 Value (p-value)

T test value (p-value)

Yes

No

  

N (%)

86 (9.33)

836 (90.67)

  

Community cohesion N (Mean, standard deviation)

86 (5.41, 1.78)

836 (4.57,1.71)

-

−4.29 (0.000)

Membership in Community Groups N (%)

 Yes

38 (9.20)

375 (90.80)

0.01 (0.90)

-

 No

48 (9.43)

461 (90.57)

 

Perceived food security status N (%)

 Not adequate food throughout the year/some months of year

20 (9.17)

198 (90.83)

0.37 (0.54)

-

 Neither deficit nor surplus

56 (8.52)

601 (91.48)

 

 Surplus food throughout the year

10 (21.28)

37 (78.72)

 

Mother’s Education N (%)

 Illiterate

8 (4.68)

163 (95.32)

5.99 (0.50)

-

 Up to Primary

61 (9.98)

550 (90.02)

 

 Secondary & above

17 (12.14)

123 (87.86)

 

Mother’s age in years N (%)

 16–25

51 (9.34)

495 (90.66)

0.51 (0.78)

-

 26–29

22 (10.23)

193 (89.77)

 

 30-Max

13 (8.07)

148 (91.93)

 

Child’s gender N (%)

 Male

42 (8.43)

456 (91.57)

1.02 (0.31)

-

 Female

44 (10.38)

380 (89.62)

 

Age in completed months N (mean, standard deviation)

86 (32.19,13.13)

836 (32.34, 17.40)

-

0.08 (0.94)

Caste N (%)

 General

67 (10.01)

602 (89.99)

1.36 (0.24)

-

 SC/ST/OBC

19 (7.51)

234 (92.49)

 

Place of delivery N (%)

 Home

42 (8.77)

437 (91.23)

0.37 (0.54)

 

 Institution

44 (9.93)

399 (90.07)

-

Child registered at Anganwadi center N (%)

 Yes

76 (9.74)

704 (90.26)

1.04 (0.31)

 

 No

10 (7.04)

132 (92.96)