Skip to main content

Table 1 Opinion, perception and practices related to governance

From: Local self governance in health - a study of it’s functioning in Odisha, India

Attributes

District classification

P

Priority

Non-priority

Total

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

Are you involved in development of district / sub-district plan of the current year?

Yes

31

58.5

45

78.9

76

69.1

p = 0.020*

No

22

41.5

12

21.1

34

30.9

Total

53

100

57

100

110

100

Are you trained in preparation of district/block operational plans (PIP) development?

Yes

14

27.5

27

47.4

41

38

p = 0.033*

No

37

72.5

30

52.6

67

62

Total

51

100

57

100

108

100

Could you establish local priorities different from the centrally sponsored schemes?

Yes

9

18.4

6

10.7

15

14.3

p = 0.264

No

40

81.6

50

89.3

90

85.7

Total

49

100

56

100

105

100

Do officials from other departments participate in formulating district/block health plan?

Yes

40

76.9

25

45.5

65

60.7

p < 0.001**

No

12

23.1

30

54.5

42

39.3

Total

52

100

55

100

107

100

Do you include activities of other sectors in district/block health plan?

Yes

34

70.8

23

41.8

57

55.3

p = 0.003*

No

14

29.2

32

58.2

46

44.7

Total

48

100

55

100

103

100

How frequently are review/monitoring meetings for health activities conducted?

Weekly

3

6

4

7.1

7

6.6

p = 0.069

Monthly

14

28

26

46.4

40

37.7

Quarterly

32

64

22

39.3

54

50.9

End of year

0

0

0

0

0

0

Irregularly

1

2

4

7.1

5

4.7

Total

50

100

56

99.9

106

99.9

  1. * Significant. ** Highly significant