Skip to main content

Table 1 Socio-demographic and anamnestic data (absolute numbers and percentages or mean ± standard deviation and median)

From: Evaluation of 5536 patients treated in an integrative outpatient tinnitus treatment center–immediate effects and a modeling approach for sustainability

 

Male

Female

Total

No answer

N

2.736 (49.9 %)

2.688 (49.0 %)

5.480

56 (1.0 %)

Age in years

49.8 ± 14.6; 50.0

49.8 ± 13.2; 50.0

49.8 ± 13.9; 50.0

59 (2.4 %)

Marital status

▪ single

▪ Married/fixed partner

▪ Divorced/living separated

▪ Widowed

461 (16.9 %)

1.711 (62.5 %)

321 (11.7 %)

229 (8.4 %)

387 (14.4 %)

2.069 (77.0 %)

178 (6.6 %)

46 (1.7 %)

848 (15.5 %)

3.784 (69.1 %)

500 (9.1 %)

275 (5.0 %)

73

(1,3 %)

Graduation

▪ Lower Secondary School

▪ Secondary School

▪ High-School

▪ University/College

885 (32.4 %)

863 (31.5 %)

529 (19.3 %)

416 (15.2 %)

985 (36.6 %)

677 (25.2 %)

393 (14.6 %)

589 (21.9 %)

1874 (34.2 %)

1.540 (28.1 %)

922 (16.8 %)

1.005 (18.3 %)

139 (2.5 %)

Profession

▪ Work-men

▪ Clerk

▪ Self-employed

▪ Not employed

204 (7.4 %)

1.319 (48.2 %)

100 (3.6 %)

1.062 (38.8 %)

532 (19.8 %)

1.166 (43.4 %)

166 (6.2 %)

793 (29.5 %)

737 (13.4 %)

2.486 (45.4 %)

266 (4.9 %)

1.858 (33.9 %)

133 (2.4 %)

Duration of tinnitus in month

54.2 ± 75.5, 21.0

66.1 ± 88.5, 24.0

60.2 ± 82.5, 24.0

239 (9.6 %)

Loudness of ear-ringing (from 0 = „not at all“ to 10 = “maximum”)

5.8 ± 2.1, 6.0

5.7 ± 2.2, 6.0

5.7 ± 2.1, 6.0

278 (11.2 %)

Disruption due to of ear-ringing (from 0 = „not at all“ to 10 = “maximum”)

6.4 ± 2.5, 6.0

6.1 ± 2.4, 6.0

6.2 ± 2.4, 6.0

251 (10.1 %)

Restrictions due to ear-ringing (from 0 = „not at all“ to 10 = “maximum”)

4.8 ± 2.8, 5.0

4.5 ± 2.7, 4.0

4.7 ± 2.8, 5.0

278 (11.2 %)