Name of the variable | Description of the variable |
---|---|
Satisfaction with healthcare services: | 1 = satisfied, 0 = not satisfied |
Explanatory variable | Â |
Self-perceived health (SAH): | 1 = Excellent, 2 = good, 3 = average, 4 = poor, 5 = worst |
Confounding factors | Â |
Socio-economic strata (SES): | quintile 1 = poorest, 2 = poor, 3 = middle group, 4 = affluent, 5 = richest |
 | Living standard (condition) variables in the survey used in principal component analysis (PCA) to create the SES measure: type of dwelling unit (1 = detached house, 0 = other); ownership of the residence (1 = own, 0 = don’t own); connected to the centralized sanitary (sewerage) services (1 = yes, 0 = no); crowding (square metre living space available per household member); toilet outside the dwelling unit (1 = yes, 0 = no); access to a computer with internet at home (1 = yes, 0 = no); production on household owned agricultural land (1 = yes, 0 = no); and ownership of livestock/cattle (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
Presence of chronic disease: | Diagnosed with high blood pressure (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
Use of healthcare services: | (1 = yes, 0 = no) |
Coverage with BBP (Basic benefit package): | 1 = yes, 2 = no |
Recipient of poverty benefit: 1 = yes, 2 = no |  |
Settlement of residence: | capital city, urban, rural |
Dwelling condition (a self-perceived expression as a response to the question ‘please evaluate your housing condition’): | 1 = good; 2 = satisfactory, 3 = bad |
Used medical services in the last thirty days: | 1 = once, 2 = twice, 3 = more than twice |
Education: | 1 = below secondary school, 2 = secondary school (including vocational training), 3 = college and above |
Demography: | age (15 years and above) and gender (1 = male and 0 = female) |
Geography of residence: | Region (Capital city, Yerevan; other regions are: Aragatsotn, Ararat, Armavir, Gegharkunik, Kotayk, Lori, Shirak, Sjunik, Tavush and Vayots Dzor) |
Year of survey: 2010, 2011, and 2012. | Â |