Comparing methods for identifying patients with heart failure using electronic data sources
© Alqaisi et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 28 April 2009
Accepted: 18 December 2009
Published: 18 December 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|28 Apr 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|8 Jun 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M Di Bari|
|8 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuele Baldasseroni|
|10 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - David Lanfear|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Sep 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - M Di Bari|
|7 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Samuele Baldasseroni|
|5 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - David Lanfear|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Dec 2009||Editorially accepted|
|18 Dec 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-9-237|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.