Private costs almost equal health care costs when intervening in mild Alzheimer's: a cohort study alongside the DAISY trial
© Søgaard et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 20 March 2009
Accepted: 25 November 2009
Published: 25 November 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|20 Mar 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Guk-Hee Suh|
|3 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Rikke Sogaard|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Guk-Hee Suh|
|11 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Rikke Sogaard|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|19 Nov 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Rikke Sogaard|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|19 Nov 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Nov 2009||Editorially accepted|
|25 Nov 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-9-215|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.