Paper section and topic | Item | Descriptor |
---|---|---|
Title and abstract Design | 1 | → Interdisciplinary Diabetes Care Teams operating on the interface between primary and specialty care are associated with improved outcomes of care: Findings from the Leuven Diabetes Project. |
Introduction Background | 2 | → Scientific background and explanation of rationale: see Background section → Clustering: randomization at GP-level, primary/secondary outcomes at patient level. → Randomized per practice; stratified |
Methods Participants | 3 | → All 379 primary care physicians (PCP's) that actively execute their profession in the project region were invited to participate. → The only inclusion criterion for the PCP's is the agreement to bring in all their known patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this way selection bias is prevented. Patients had to provide informed consent before their data could be transmitted for collection and analysis. Only patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were be included in the study, regardless of their age. Patients who were not capable to provide informed consent were excluded from the study. → Data were collected on paper files and from medical records |
Interventions | 4 | → See methods section |
Objectives | 5 | → See methods section |
Outcomes | 6 | → The primary endpoints of the study were the proportion of patients reaching three clinical ADA-targets: (1) HbA1c < 7%; (2) SBD ≤ 130 mm Hg; (3) LDL-C < 100 mg/dl. Secondary endpoints were the mean improvements in individual parameters of 12 validated parameters, i.e. HbA1c, LDL-C, HDL-C, Total Cholesterol, SBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), weight, physical exercise, healthy diet, smoking status, statin and anti-platelet therapy. |
Sample size | 7 | → The financer to the project imposes a sample size of minimal one third of the potential PCP's. Using the calculator of the university of Aberdeen, sample size for cluster trials was computed. With a significance level of 0.05 and assumed Intra Cluster Coefficient of 0.1, we calculated that 114 clusters with a cluster size of 20 gave 80% power to detect between AQIP and UQIP a 10% in the absolute difference in the proportion of patients achieving a 10% improvement in the primary biochemical endpoints. Based on the fitted mixed models the observed ICC values are: HBA1C: 0.0445, SBD: 0.0466, LDL Cholesterol: 0.0399. |
Randomization Sequence generation | 8 | → After the recruitment period, using computer-generated numbers, a researcher not involved the study and blind to the identity of the practices will perform a randomization stratified by practice size (solo/duo/group practice) and the presence/absence of an electronic medical recording system. |
Allocation concealment | 9 | → Program Manager - invitation, stratified. → To minimize the possibility of selection bias all patients within a cluster were included |
Implementation | 10 | → Allocation: Van Den Broeke Carine, researcher to the scientific team, → Enrollment: Borgermans Liesbeth, researcher to the scientific team, → Assignment: program manager |
Blinding (masking) | 11 | → No blinding was possible at physician level, (both groups presented as 'intervention'), but patients didn't know to which intervention arm their physician belonged. |
Statistical methods | 12 | → See methods section, sub-heading statistical analysis. |