Dutch healthcare reform: did it result in performance improvement of health plans? A comparison of consumer experiences over time
© Hendriks et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 29 December 2008
Accepted: 17 September 2009
Published: 17 September 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|29 Dec 2008||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hans Maarse|
|6 Apr 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alain Enthoven|
|25 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Hendriks|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|29 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Alain Enthoven|
|5 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hans Maarse|
|12 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Hendriks|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Michelle Hendriks|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|9 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|17 Sep 2009||Editorially accepted|
|17 Sep 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-9-167|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.