Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: An observational study
© Cook et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 14 April 2009
Accepted: 14 September 2009
Published: 14 September 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Apr 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kirstie McKenzie-McHarg|
|26 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth VanDenKerkhof|
|27 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oyvind Bjertnaes|
|22 Jul 2009||Author responded||Author comments - julia cook|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|22 Jul 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Jul 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Elizabeth VanDenKerkhof|
|4 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Oyvind Bjertnaes|
|14 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - julia cook|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|26 Aug 2009||Author responded||Author comments - julia cook|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|26 Aug 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|14 Sep 2009||Editorially accepted|
|14 Sep 2009||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-9-160|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article.. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.