Development and validation of the Diabetes Numeracy Test (DNT)
© Huizinga et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 15 May 2007
Accepted: 01 May 2008
Published: 01 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 May 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hayden Bosworth|
|12 Sep 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rima Rudd|
|23 Nov 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Margaret Huizinga|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Nov 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Dec 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hayden Bosworth|
|15 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rima Rudd|
|20 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Margaret Huizinga|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|20 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hayden Bosworth|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|1 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|1 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-8-96|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.