Appropriate disclosure of a diagnosis of dementia: identifying the key behaviours of 'best practice'
© Lecouturier et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 28 November 2007
Accepted: 01 May 2008
Published: 01 May 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|28 Nov 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Els Derksen|
|21 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Byszewski|
|25 Feb 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Lecouturier|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Feb 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Els Derksen|
|25 Mar 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Anna Byszewski|
|14 Apr 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Lecouturier|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|14 Apr 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|1 May 2008||Editorially accepted|
|1 May 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-8-95|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.