Peer-mentoring for first-time mothers from areas of socio-economic disadvantage: A qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial
© Murphy et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008
Received: 05 July 2007
Accepted: 27 February 2008
Published: 27 February 2008
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|5 Jul 2007||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Aug 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Ingram|
|19 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rhona McInnes|
|25 Oct 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Homer|
|12 Nov 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Lumley|
|7 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Margaret Cupples|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 Jan 2008||Author responded||Author comments - Margaret Cupples|
|24 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Lumley|
|28 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rhona McInnes|
|28 Jan 2008||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Homer|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 Jan 2008||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Feb 2008||Editorially accepted|
|27 Feb 2008||Article published||10.1186/1472-6963-8-46|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.